Langhui

ATT&CK Detection Gap and TTP Reasoning Dataset

500 ~ 1,500 high-value detection gap analyses + TTP chain of reasoning ⁇ log data source mapping ⁇ five-dimensional association ⁇ detection engineering automation training

1,500
High-value analysis data
Testing gaps
Overwrite Analysis
TTP chain of reasoning
Attack reasoning
Log Map
Data source association
3-4
Delivery Cycle

Dataset Overview

Definition:ATT&CK Detection Gap and TTP Reasoning Datasetis provided byChangsha Langhui Information Technology Co., Ltd.The focus is on the current enterprise safety detection system with a blind coverage area, providing detailed detection gap analysis, multistep TTP reasoning chains and log data source mapping for each ATT&CK technology, and training in the capability to assist in engineering automation and safety large model reasoning.

Dataset NameATT&CK Detection Gap and TTP Reasoning Dataset
Total Data Volume500~1,500
Data TypeStructured JSON
Data SourceLanghui Security Laboratory
License TypeCommercial Licensing Complete authorization documents are attached
Delivery Cycle3-4
Overwrite Technology100+AT&CK Technology/Subtechnologies
Output FormatJSONL / CSV
LanguageChinese-English Bilingual

Core Data Fields

Each data contains technical identification, detection gap analysis, TTP reasoning chain, log data source mapping and recommended detection rules, covering the full chain from gap identification to rule generation.

Field CategoryField CountTypical Fields
Technical identification4Technique_id (ATT&CK technical ID), technique_name (technical name), technical (accomplicated tactics), platform (applicable platform)
Test Gap Description3Dete action_gap (detailed description of the detection gap), gap_category (disparities category: blind areas/misreporting/delayed), impact_assessment (impact assessment)
TTP chain of reasoning4Step_no (serial number of attack step), action (description of attack action), tool_used (use of tools/technology), expected_log (expected log feature)
Log Data Source Map3Data_source (data source type), log_ type (logbook type, e.g. Windows Evet/NetFlow/EDR), log_field (key log field)
Recommended testing rules3rule_type (rule type: Sigma/YARA/Snort), rule_content (rules content clip), false_positive_rate (expected misreporting rate)

Data Sample Showcase

The following is a structured JSON sample showing typical data formats for testing gap analysis, TTP reasoning chains and recommended rules.

Other Organiser
"entry id": "GAP-2024-0000347",
"technique id": "T1562.001",
"technique name": "Disabled or modified system firewalls",
"Tactic": "Defense Evasion",
"platform": "Windows",
"detion gap": {
"description": "The attackers are using the netsh or PowerShell to disable the Windows firewall, and most SIEM programmes currently monitor only service stoppages (Event ID 7036), but not those that do not produce service stoppages, but are recorded in the Microsoft-Windows-Windows Firewall Wyth Advanced Security/Firwall operational logs. " ,
"gap category": "Detect the blind zone,"
"impact assessment": "high -- leading to subsequent C2 communications not subject to firewalls, often during the initial phase of extortion software attacks."
{\cHFFFFFF}{\cH00FFFF}
"ttp chain":
"Step no": 1, "action": "Get Initial Access Through Fishing Mail", "tool used": "Spear-rating Attachment", "expected log": "Email Gateway: malicious attachment delivery record" ,
"Step no": 2, "action": "exercise PowerShell downloads C2 tools", "tool used": "PowerShell Invoke-WebRequest", "expected log": "Sysmon Event ID 1: Powershell.exe → TCP 443 outside" ,
"Step no": 3, "action": "Disable Windows Defense Real-Time Protection", "Tool used": "Set-MpPreference-Dealable Realtime Monitoring Dollar", "expected log": "Windows Defense Operations: Event ID 5001",
"Step no": 4, "action": "Deactivate Windows firewall": "netsh advfirewall set allprofils state off", "expected log": "Windows Firewall Office: Event ID 2003"
== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder man
I don't know.
"log source mapping": {
"Data source": "Windows Firewall National Log,"
"Log type": "Soft-Windows-Windowall with Advanced Security/Firawall,"
"log field": "Event ID 2003 (Setting changed), 2004 (Rule added), 2005 (Rule reduced)"
{\cHFFFFFF}{\cH00FFFF}
"suggested rule":
"rule type": "Sigma",
"rutle content": "title: Windows Firewall Disabled Via Netsh\n logsource: prevention: window, service: security:
"false positive rate": "low."<5%)— sample"
  },
  "answer": {
    "is_attack": true,
    "attack_type": "sample value",
    "attck_phase": "Defense Evasion",
    "detection_feasibility": "sample — CNFirewall OperationalCN"
  }
}

AI Application Scenarios

Testing engineering automation

Based on 1,500 detection gap analysis data, AI was trained to identify automatically the blind areas covered by the current SOC testing, and to generate the Sigma/YARA/Snort testing rules automatically, significantly improving the efficiency and coverage of the detection project.

SIEM rules smart generation

Using TTP ' s reasoning chain and log data source mapping data, AI was trained to automate the description of the attack into SIEM query rules and linkage analysis strategies, and to automate the end-to-end from ATT&CK to the end of the detectable.

Training in the reasoning chain

The multistep TTP chain of reasoning trained the causal ability of the large security model to trace back from a single warning to a complete attack chain, understand the logic of the aggressor ' s behaviour and predict the next attack.

Red and blue against simulations

Building on real detection gaps and TTP chain data, AI Red Corps agents automatically generate attack paths that bypass existing tests for continuous assessment and enhancement of enterprise security defences.

Safety base model assessment

The detection gap data sets can serve as a standardized assessment benchmark for large safety models, and quantitative assessment models for detection coverage and reasoning accuracy of various attack techniques, resulting in comparable capability images.

ATT&CK coverage assessment

Automatically analyse the detectability of existing corporate log sources to ATT&CK technologies, output cover heat effort and gap list, and provide data-driven prioritization for security building inputs.

Frequently asked questions

How are datasets authorized? Can it be used for business AI training?
This dataset is provided byChangsha Langhui Information Technology Co., Ltd.The details are available in contact with the business.
What is the coverage of the gap analysis being tested?
Covers 100+ATT&CK technology/subtechnology, each with detailed detection of blind zone analysis, TTP reasoning chain (ranging from 3-6 steps) and the corresponding log data source map. The focus now covers high-value tactical categories such as Defense Evasion, Execution, and Crystal Access.
What is the source of the TTP chain of reasoning?
The chain of reasoning is based on cross-checking of the APT report, TAS data and security incident response cases, and the security analyst at the Langhui Security Laboratory manually reviews the labels to ensure the legitimacy of the reasoning logic and the operational value of the operation.
Are the recommended test rules open and ready to be used?
The rules are a template clip in the Sigma/Yara/Snort format, indicating log sources, key fields and expected error rates. Actual deployment requires parameter optimization (e.g. threshold adjustment, white list configuration). We can also provide customized complete rule development services.
How do you obtain data or business advice?
This dataset is provided byChangsha Langhui Information Technology Co., Ltd.Our DataAssets API platform supports both standard datasets and on-demand customization. Please contact us for a detailed data catalog, sample preview, and quote plan.

Needed customised testing of engineering data programs?

Changsha Langhui Information Technology Co., Ltd. The DataAssetsAPI platform, which aims to provide high-quality, compliant security data assets to AI enterprises and scientific institutions. Supports flexible combinations by technical category, by data source, by type of test rule.

Data sample previews Customized testing rule options Professional technical support