Langhui

LangHuiAI · STEM Multimodal Benchmark

University difficulty model library

Pre-training and evaluation of SOTA multiple model large models for GPT-5 / Claude Opus / Gemini / Qwen / DeepSeek

It's built to filter "the knowledge that is really needed" -- it's only possible to enter the library with a 40% rate.

30%
Pathology / Image / Cardiotron etc.
25%
Circuit / Mechanical / Gold Equivalent
25%
Ewing / Spectroscopy / Geology, etc.
20%
Mathematics
Diagram / Geometry / Popup etc.
100%
Strong Image Dependence
The text is inseparable.
Quarterly rolling
Update on an ongoing basis
Re-evaluate archive

Why does the AI model need such a library?

Real short panel of multimodular models

The current multi-modular model still has a clear short board on image reasoning, especially where knowledge in the field of expertise is needed to combine visual understanding. A simple "show-and-talk" capability cannot replace the deep-seated logic implicit in the image.

Differentiate understandings. pattern matching

The university difficulty diagram is a good way to distinguish between the true understanding of the model and the pattern. The theme requires models that understand visual information, scientific knowledge and logic.

Extremely strict entry criteria

Five times each of the five top-level models run, and only two times a model answer pair (40% pass rate) is accepted. This means that the title in the library represents "the current frontier of AI".

A test of research-level capability.

A true research-level reasoning capability is available to stabilize models of these topics – not only to test the knowledge pool, but also to test the integration and deep reasoning of cross-modular information.

Four major STEM disciplines 32+ sub-areas are fully covered

30%

Clinical medicine Diagnosis Basic medicine Pharmacology Public health care rehabilitation
Pathological Script Identification (HE Dynamy Disorder) X-ray / CT / MRI image interpretation 12 Conectonic T.C.C.C. is miscalculated. Leather damage/eye/oral clinical image recognition Microbiological development and identification of gland chromosome pathogens Anatomical structure function question and answer Blood smears/urea slag tests interpretation Drug-protomatic curve analysis

25%

Mechanical Electronics and Electrical Computers Civil Materials Energy Agricultural Engineering
Annotated interpretation of mechanical parts/assembly icons Electro-map functional analysis and parameter calculation Type judgement of gold microimage material Mechanical analysis graph internal/twirl/morphic computation Autocontrol frame stability analysis Plant disease image recognition and prevention Analysis of data structure (trees/graphs/stacks) algorithms Thermodynamics T-s/p-V Figure Efficiency Analysis

25%

Biology — Chemistry — Physics — Earth and Environmental Science
Gemography/Western blot results analysis Cell/organizational microimage structural recognition NMR/IR/mass spectrum extrapolation molecular structure Equivalent circuit chart electrical resistance/flow direction Geological profile/column-form analysis Genetic spectra extrapolates genetic patterns and probabilities Mechanical chart motion analysis ECF efficiency calculations

Mathematics 20%

Geometric priority . Combination mathematics . Probability statistics ..expoitation algebra ..
Theoremic (Ola return road judgement/colour count) Scrolling/mixed pattern symmetry Data extrapolation in statistical charts (box line/scatter) The nature of the space/curvature mapping Three-view/show 3-D shape extrapolation Analysis of the properties of the coordinate lines curves/curve functions Expand chart 3d to surface area calculations Computation of complex geometric angle/area with guide lines

Five models, five reasoning, five monitoring of currents.

Each topic is subject to a question from a field expert, a double-revision, automated assessment, a rigorous full-process screening of the repository, ensuring that only the most difficult problems are in the front-line.

Expert issues in the field

• Expert in the subject, Master's degree, 3 years of teaching/research experience, ensuring academic rigour and image dependency on each topic.

Double-Reviser

Each topic is independently reviewed by two revisers, cross-checking to ensure correctness of answer 95%, and images correspond strictly to the dry logic.

Automation of flow line.

Five top-level multi-modular megamodels were called for the assessment as follows:

GPT-5.1 Claude Opus 4.6 Gemini-3.1-Pro Qwen3.6-Plus DeepSeek-V4

5 statistical pass rates

Each model is called five times (temperature = 0) independently to eliminate random fluctuations. 5x5 = 25 reasoning results are aggregated to calculate the overall pass rate.

Zero percent. Strict entrance threshold.

Only 40% pass rate (i.e., two times answer for each model). A title that goes beyond this threshold means that the current model is stable and has no forward-looking challenge value.

Quarterly rolling review and auto-archive

Retest the topics entered in the library using the latest model version on a quarterly basis. If a subject is stabilized by a new model (pass rate > 60%), the archive is automatically downgraded to ensure that the repository remains a frontal boundary.

Strict comparison:This criterion is at least 2-3 times more stringent than the screening criteria for open benchmarks such as MMU. Benchmarks such as MMU usually require only one single model to deduce, while we have significantly raised the threshold of entry using a five model x five-doctraction cross-certification mechanism.

Compliance and isolation Zero overlapping safeguards

Public evaluation and measurement quarantine

There is no overlap with the following 8 public assessment sets, ensuring isolation by double-matching text + image:

MMMUMMMU-ProMathVisionMathVista SeePhysDynaMathCMMMUScienceQA

Internal Reload and Content Red Line

Internal text + image is double-heavy and the following types of data are strictly prohibited:

Text/formula screenshot Decorative Images Template homogenizing data Image Info Redundancy

Data delivery ..Input productization

Standard format: JSON Lines

A full title record per row, containing title text, image (original size + standard tailor), standard answers, detailed deprogramming steps. Compatible with the data loader of the mainstream LLM training framework.

API Caller

Supports batch pull-down of full data, incremental updates of subscriptions (new titles per week/month). ResTful API+ page breaker, adapted to automated training lines.

MetadataAnnotation

Each data is accompanied by complete metadata: title ID / discipline / subarea / difficulty / original image size / model training recommended size / relying type / revise record.

Data infrastructure for AGI

See the chart, see the reasoning.

Multi-modular models are evolving from "talking" to "critic reasoning" and university difficulty diagrams are the key fuel that drives this transformation.

4 University Section 32+ Subarea

The library covers the four main fields of health and medicine, technology and engineering, natural sciences and mathematics, and simulates real university examination scenarios, covering undergraduate and postgraduate levels.

Quarterly rolling Quarters Quarters

New topics are added and reviewed on a quarterly basis, outdated topics are automatically archived, model capabilities are tracked on a continuous basis and up-to-date frontier data are provided to clients.

Service the top AI laboratory worldwide

Clients include the top AI laboratories worldwide, which are used for pre-training data enhancement, competency assessment, course learning (Curriculum Learning) and the promotion of AGI front-line research.

Get STEM full directory and sample of multimodular libraries

DataAssetsAPI continues to expand the STEM Multi-Modes Library to support customised delivery by discipline, difficulty, and problem. Contact our data specialists to get a complete catalogue, data samples and quotations.